Party: | GroenLinks |
---|
R9: Sustainable Finance: Stop Red Financing
Title
Draft text
The transition from a polluting fossil-based economy to a sustainable inclusive
and regenerative economy that operates well within planetary boundaries requires
trillions of euros, dollars, pesos, yuan, and yen. Whether public or private,
investments need to flow towards green activities that help this transition.
This necessity is reflected in one of the three main objectives of the Paris
Agreement:
"Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas
emissions and climate-resilient development."
Europe is leading the league of stimulating green investments. The European
Commission has formulated a sustainable finance strategy as part of the Green
Deal. This strategy is helping to define what is green, create more transparency
through new sustainability reporting requirements for companies, banks, and
investment funds and set a worldwide standard on sustainable finance.
An important foundation for the sustainable finance strategy is the European
Taxonomy Regulation (EU Taxonomy). This new green language was created to stop
greenwashing and create clarity on what is green for the financial sector. When
an economic activity substantially contributes to an environmental objective
under the EU Green deal, not harming other objectives but taking into account
minimal social safeguards, only then can economic activity qualify as green.
All criteria are supposed to be set along the latest scientific and sectoral
insights, reviewed in a three- to five-year cycle to be aligned with that
sustainable, inclusive and circular economy. A new language that paves the way
for the financial sector to push for green must be a dream came true.
While the basis for the EU Taxonomy was science, amendments to the proposal have
watered down the text to the point that its effectiveness is now being
questioned by Member States, environmental organisations and even the financial
sector. Gas activities that have clearly be shown not to contribute to climate-
change mitigation are now part of the taxonomy. Nuclear activities produce
nuclear waste that can significantly pollute soil and water, cause security
risks and put a burden on future generations to safely process this waste. Yet,
they are included in the Taxonomy Regulation. With the creation of a new green
language, the definition of green seems to have been stretched so that everyone
can be a part of it.
The focus of the EU Taxonomy is limited to classifying that which is green, not
what is red or unsustainable. Unsustainable means that an activity does
significant harm to an environmental objective, something we do not want. Thus,
the sustainable finance strategy creates maximum transparency for the good,
green parts in our economy, while the unsustainable activities remain opaque.
This provides an opportunity for plenty of green marketing, while unsustainable
economic activities are ongoing and stopping us from living in balance with our
planet. As the EU standards are considered by many to be the standard to follow
and copy, not considering these activities implies that other countries will
also fail to address activities that significantly harm environmental objectives
in their respective taxonomies.
The European Green Party wants maximum transparency both within companies, banks
and investment funds and the public sector so that everyone can see just who is
helping us towards a bright green future and who is keeping us in the polluting
fossil dark age.
Therefore, the EGP urges the European Commission and the Platform for
Sustainable Finance to prioritise the creation of a red/unsustainable taxonomy.
This should consist of all economic
activities that significantly harm our environmental objectives and/or do
significant social harm to our social objectives. This includes activities like,
but not limited to:
- Energy production using any solid, liquid and gaseous fossil fuels;
- The primary production of plastic;
- The manufacturing of aluminium and steel that benchmark with 25% of the
lowest-scoring factories in the EU;
- Air, road, or water transportation using (over 50%) blends of fossil
fuels;
- AM-61-1 Miljöpartiet de gröna
- AM-61-2 Oikologoi Prasinoi / Ecologist Greens
- AM-61-3 Die Grünen, die grüne Alternative
- AM-61-4 BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen
- AM-61-5 Vihreät - De Gröna
- Conversion of waste to electricity or heat;
- Subsidies, financial incentives, or other support from the public sector
to fossil-fuel-related investments, including those in fossil-fuel
infrastructure.
Furthermore, the Commission set out to present a social taxonomy, introducing a
classification of economic activities that significantly contribute to social
goals in the EU and represent a common code for investors, businesses and
regulators as regards what is sustainable from a social perspective and what is
not. However, the EU plans to introduce a social taxonomy has been put on hold
until at least the end of this parliamentary term, with a lack of political will
and the absence of international standards to measure the social impacts cited
as the main stumbling blocks.
The EGP urges the European Commission to implement the red taxonomy and the
social taxonomy in the EU sustainable finance strategy, setting clear thresholds
for the financial sector to be active in activities that significantly harm our
environment.
Amendments
- AM-1-1 (Europe Ecologie - Les Verts)
- AM-1-2 (BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen)
- AM-18-1 (BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen)
- AM-45-1 (BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen)
- AM-50-1 (BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen)
- AM-54-1 (Vihreät - De Gröna)
- AM-55-1 (BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen)
- AM-56-1 (Vihreät - De Gröna)
- AM-59-1 (SF - Green Left)
- AM-61-1 (Miljöpartiet de gröna)
- AM-61-2 (Oikologoi Prasinoi / Ecologist Greens)
- AM-61-3 (Die Grünen, die grüne Alternative)
- AM-61-4 (BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen)
- AM-61-5 (Vihreät - De Gröna)
- AM-62-1 (Die Grünen, die grüne Alternative)
- AM-65-1 (Miljöpartiet de gröna)
- AM-69-1 (BÜNDNIS 90/Die Grünen)
- AM-72-1 (Groen)
- AM-73-1 (Miljöpartiet de gröna)